1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    So easy for the pundits to just say scrap it.

    At a loss of roughly $300 Million a copy.
     
    1. slutwolf
      That's not forgotten ,
      but it still would cost many more millions to put the dogs to work , if anyone will ride in n them .

      Plus there will be billions worth of empty planes sitting around for a long time anyway .

      Also , they mostly have brand new or near new engines n things of big value ,
      which can be used in future ,
      as replacements , or new fits elsewhere in a safe properly designed plane.

      Besides , cost is not an excuse to continue with a dangerous failure .
       
      slutwolf, Jun 9, 2020
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    Pundits make it sound so simple.

    The max 8 is a new plane, and in spite of its current shortcomings it is still a fine airplane.

    The current surplus of air seats will not last. Shooter predicts within the year we'll be back to flying like cattle in cattle cars.

    Those idle max 8's will be needed, and the people who are afraid to fly in them can ride the train.

    By the time the FAA et al recertify the Max it will be the best plane ever built.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    1. slutwolf
      You have more faith than many.

      Before it ever flew it was known to be inherently unstable , and not a good design , according the many experts.

      I'm not one , but when the smoke there's fire , and if it smells rotten it often is.

      To many very good explanations of what was/is wrong with it ,
      and no convincing argument is or will ever be really safe.
      (that is , as safe as aircraft can be)

      Even long after the obvious , they still kept finding more problems , and then more still.
      It'll never be more than a bogied up botch job for most travelers.
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
      submissively speaking likes this.
    2. Ed Itor
      But didn't the FAA say it was okay the first time around?
      Like we should accept this recommendation to just because they say so.
      If you Yanks want to fly in them please do so but keep them to yourselves.
      Oh wait send them to China if you want in exchange for Hawi phones.
       
      Ed Itor, Jun 28, 2020
    3. shootersa
      Why yes, the FAA said once before ..... based in part on Boeing assurances ........ that the max was good to go.

      So, you think, given developments since then, that the FAA is still taking Boeings word for it?

      And those other issues that have surfaced, have any of them been safety issues?
       
      shootersa, Jun 28, 2020
  3. RSSInfros

    RSSInfros Newcumer

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2020
    Messages:
    7
    I expect a boom on seating in the next year, I'm even thinking of get my hands on some Boeing stocks
     
    1. slutwolf
      Good luck.
      We're ready to go now , so if you're right we will be very happy campers.

      and with luck , we'll be first can off the rank
      :)
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
      stumbler and RSSInfros like this.
    2. shootersa
      And Shooter really, really, wants to come visit in November, you know, if the virus hasn't killed us all by then.
       
      shootersa, Jun 10, 2020
    3. slutwolf
      Nah , it only kills old farts

      dosen't it.

      According to some the flu is worse n I've survived a few decades of that
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
    4. shootersa
      Ooh, cheeky!
       
      shootersa, Jun 10, 2020
  4. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324

    Let's put a marker down on this one.
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. conroe4
      Yep, kiwis are well known for their accomplishments and heroism. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
       
      conroe4, Jun 10, 2020
    3. slutwolf
      Are they ?
      You seem to know more about it than me.

      Do tell

      But kiwi do get everywhere , somehow .
      Like top of Everest , first ..
      South poll
      Craking the atom , first
      Jetboating the Colorado , first
      Winning the CanAm
      Building formula one (a bloke named McLaren)
      Winning at the brickyard
      Nicking the America's Cup , a coupla times
      Joining Fleetwood Mac
      Touring with Led Zep
      n bungy jumpin

      I'm bored now , but
      we get about n have a lotsa fun ,
      even building rockets n launching stuff for NASA , and to the moon soon.

      Your damned lucky there's only 5mill of us , or we might be running half your stuff to , like your basketballers
      :)
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
    4. conroe4
      Hahahaha, there's a good one. Our basketballers have too much voice, and not enough upstairs.

      I loved New Zealand when I visited. But you Kiwi men are some muley and stubborn sumbitches.
      Ya got some purty women.
       
      conroe4, Jun 10, 2020
    5. slutwolf
      I thaught you'd like that , lol
      So do you know which NY outfit is run by a kiwi ?
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
      stumbler likes this.
    6. conroe4
      No, I know very little about New York too. LOL
       
      conroe4, Jun 10, 2020
  5. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    Well, but no plane would ever dare crash with a Kiwi at the controls.

    Or an American for that matter.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. slutwolf
      Geez , you can rely on that if you want ,
      but count me out.

      We have our share of cowboys to ya know
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
  6. Lxv200

    Lxv200 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    Messages:
    2,903
    Hi. Beside the 737 max problems .The 787-8 also had major problems with bad design. all 787's build quality,KC46 (767 usaf tanker) over cost and build quality.boeing space capsule has problems also the last 737 -800 built was delivered very late because the fuselage and wing did not fit.Boeing is only interested in making a quick buck and they only have themselves to blame.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    1. slutwolf
      Yep ,
      they certainly been well off their game in recent years.

      Pretty silly really , with Airbus going ganbusters , it's just a gift of time for them to fix their bits of problems ,
      while Boeing's playing with (not) flying junk.

      :)

      And if they don't up their game soon , Musk will toast them with his FBR to.
      LOL
       
      slutwolf, Jun 10, 2020
      stumbler likes this.
  7. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    Oh, don't count Boeing out just yet. The company does a lot more than build airplanes. At one point Boeing had some 1,300 separate companies.
     
  8. Lxv200

    Lxv200 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    Messages:
    2,903
    I agree Boeing will not go bust.The US miltary would be crippled if that happened.Half there aircraft would lose there support over night
     
  9. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Boeing 737 Max to Begin Certification Flight Tests

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/boeing-737-max-to-begin-certification-flight-tests?ref=home
     
  10. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    No matter. Worldwide demand for new aircraft is essentially zero, and Boeng has a backlog of over 400 737's.

    This is because of Covid, another casualty in the covid wars.
     
  11. Lxv200

    Lxv200 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    Messages:
    2,903
    But that would only for US airlines flying in US airspace .The rest of the world will be doing there own tests but because of covid 19 and the ban on EU people entering the US this has been delayed.Also i wonder if airline that code share ie say just for one American and British airways would be able sell a ticket on a non EU certificate aircrat in the EU .The world used to take the FAA as the gold standard but after this they what to do it themselves.
     
  12. Lxv200

    Lxv200 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    Messages:
    2,903
    Also with 800 aircraft on the ground all will have to be modified and overhauled.The simulators modified and the pilots trained.There are not a large number of 737max simulators because Boeing said the were not needed.It will be 2020 before the max enters service in large number .Thats of course if people what to fly on them.With covid 19 and the max people may not what to take 2 chances by flying on them
     
    1. johnrael
      EASA has been there along with the FAA in monitoring the re-certification process. If one accepts it, the other will too.
       
      johnrael, Jun 29, 2020
  13. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    Shooter would be more concerned about the competency of the flight crew than the stability of the aircraft.
     
  14. conroe4

    conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,759
    Max 8 flew safely since certification in 2017. It took 2 third world pilots to screw that up.

    Yes, you have to be competent in order to fly an airplane.
     
  15. freethinker

    freethinker Pervy Bear

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,318
    The simulator modifications may actually be simpler than you think - an easy software change, most likely made at the same time the software modifications are made to the aircraft. I worked on flight sims over 20 years on military aircraft, and as an example, we could program any of a number of versions of an aircraft for the training mission. This was done because, not only do our forces fly different versions of each type, but versions provided to other countries (who sometimes sent pilots to the US for training) through arms sales are not always the most up-to-date versions (weapon systems, electronic warfare, etc).

    And remember, those 'third world pilots' that crashed weren't trained on that specific malfunction, because Boeing assumed it would never occur and, in updating training for the Max 8, decided training for it was unnecessary. And, unfortunately, the FAA took their word for it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
    Shooters point was that the 737 will do exactly what it was designed to do, and has done thousands of times since it first flew, cause, you know, physics.

    The variable in the end is the competency of the flight crew.
     
    1. freethinker
      And my point is, how they are trained factors in as well.
       
      freethinker, Jun 28, 2020
    2. conroe4
      So we trained third world pilots differently than all others? I doubt that, but it's only an opinion.

      I'd more lean toward incompetency. Boeing suffered for it. I did more than work on simulators. I am an FAA certified pilot. and we were taught how to fly an airplane, and when I went on to fly aerobatics, I learned that an airplane will actually fly itself, if ya just let go of the controls. No shit.

      Doesn't matter. We're not flying for a while because of the fucking chinese.
       
      conroe4, Jun 28, 2020
    3. shootersa
      Same with whitewater rafting. The damn raft will guide itself if the guide will just relax and let it.

      Well, at least most of the time.
       
      shootersa, Jun 28, 2020
    4. conroe4
      LOL, thinking of the training girl that hit a rock, killed the engine, and we went careening off the canyon walls backwards and totally out of control.
      Parked at Phantom Ranch, and then she hit a sandbar backing out of the place. We changed boats the next day. LOL

      She didn't look third world...
       
      conroe4, Jun 28, 2020
    5. freethinker
      I didn't say Boeing trained the pilots differently. I said Boeing never anticipated that problem occurring, and never covered it iin their flight manuals or training.
       
      freethinker, Jun 28, 2020
  17. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,572
  18. slutwolf

    slutwolf Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    20,466
    With over 16,000 airliners grounded and in long term storage world wide ,
    for God knows how long ,
    who is going to want anything to do with a few unsafe deathtraps ,
    that need modifications and recertifying ,
    before anyone can even begin to try and prove them safe ?

    Then , whose going to fly in them .

    Boeing's word is not worth a cunt full of cold snow.

    They never came clean.
    They denied , denied , denied and obfuscated , untill they were dragged kicking and screaming to thier castration.

    Hundreds of good safe planes will probably never fly again ,
    thousands will not fly for a couple of years and more.

    We won't have WW open skies at least untill there is a widely available vaccine , with widespread uptake..

    Then
    what will the new tourism look like ?

    How many will want to return to
    thier assets being overrun with rampant uncontrolled , destructive low value tourism.

    Amongst all of this;
    Who's gonna want a smelly dog that may never come home one day.

    The planes were not grounded for a year and a half because some pilots weren't trained to fly them properly.
    The Max8 had basic design faults , which Boeing had been warned about ,
    were a bad design modification ,
    and inherently unstable and unsafe.

    The "special training" that was not made available , and the updates and modifications that were never actioned ,
    were all designed to mask and get around the basic known problem.

    I saw the actual interview (early on) , in which a Boeing executive admitted that these things were not done
    "because they were not required to do them"
    by the FAA.

    That is why two foreign piloted aircraft killed so many.
    They were not told anything about special training , particular difficulties , or how to mitigate them.
    And remember ;
    Problems that if/when they arose , they had

    just 47 seconds to solve.

    It is most ingenious to pass those two crashes off as just the pilots fault.

    That dose not wash.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Lxv200

    Lxv200 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    Messages:
    2,903
    Earlier in the year at the FAA and Boeing asked various US airline line pilots to fly the max sim with the old software with some mods and they had problems with the aircraft it was put in tha same situation with a damaged attitude sensor.They had very serious problems landing the aircraft safely.And they knew what to expect.
     
    1. slutwolf
      Exactly.

      It is a basically bad remodeling of an old design , that had wings adapted and moved ,
      so they could shoehorn a different bigger engine into it.

      It quite simply was not safe by modern standards.

      (and many said so)
       
      slutwolf, Jun 28, 2020
      stumbler likes this.