1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    What did I say that is not true?

    Regardless of what Republican politicians say when campaigning, the only people they really care about are rich people.

    Democrat politicians seem to care more about black criminals, illegal immigrants, homosexuals, and transsexuals than law abiding white heterosexual Christians like me.

    I dislike directions the Democrat Party has taken since the assassination of John Kennedy in 1963, but I still vote Democrat. I am neither a partisan nor am I an ideologue.
     
    #81
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,390
    Anyone else notice that it seems that the Kennedy assassination started us on a path of cynicism and extreme views.
    It was the first serious conspiracy theory (and still rages today), the first time we lost faith in government overall, and the last time we as a nation backed a president.
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. NoOneFamous
      I would vote for JFK over just about any Republican
       
      NoOneFamous, Dec 1, 2017
    3. msman
      Don't you think it is a little too late?
       
      msman, Dec 1, 2017
    #82
  3. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534

    Kennedy had plenty off opposition from the country but after a young man is gunned down we forget that....

    when they killed his brother it really became a ---wtf is doing this.....
     
    #83
  4. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    John Kennedy won the 1960 election by a very slim majority in the popular vote. Lyndon Johnson won the 1964 election by landslides in both the popular vote, and in the Electoral College.

    --------

    Pew Research Center, MAY 3, 2017

    Public trust in the government remains near historic lows. Only 20% of Americans today say they can trust the government in Washington to do what is right “just about always” (4%) or “most of the time” (16%).
    *not_secure_link*www.people-press.org/2017/05/03/public-trust-in-government-1958-2017/

    --------

    In October 15, 1964 a survey indicated that 77% of the American people trusted the government to do the right thing "all or most of the time." Barry Goldwater ran against that consensus and suffered the consequences.

    Trust in the government declined sharply after then.

    Liberals blame the War in Vietnam and Watergate. Nevertheless, these were transitory events. I doubt most Americans think about them any more.

    I think the black response to the civil rights legislation is mainly responsible.

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed into law July 2, 1964. In July 16 a black ghetto riot began in Harlem that lasted for seven days.

    The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed into law August 6, 1965. In August 11 a more serious black ghetto riot began in Watts in California. this lasted until August 16.

    During 1966, 1967, and 1968 there were increasingly serious black ghetto riots throughout the United States. Although liberals blamed the riots on white racism, the riots only began after the civil movement began making legal progress. Moreover, there were no major riots in any of the eleven former Confederate states.

    Whites noticed that the riots ended with the inauguration of Richard Nixon in 1969. Nixon was rewarded with a landslide victory in 1972.

    (For the record, I voted for George McGovern in 1972. I am still glad I did.)

    In 1965 Congress approved of the Immigration Act of 1965. This was signed by Lyndon Johnson, despite the fact that a Gallup survey indicated that the vast majority of the American people opposed it. The Immigration Act of 1965 led to vast increases in legal and illegal immigration.

    It was not supposed to be this way. During the civil rights movement supporters of the movement confidently predicted that when Negroes were no longer discriminated against they would behave and perform as well as whites. It is obvious to everyone that this has not happened. Instead there have been significant increases in black social pathology.

    Even well behaving immigrants compete for jobs and depress wages. I believe that the Immigration Reform Act is a major reason for the growing income gap.

    The vast majority of white blue collar workers used to vote Democrat. They do not any more because they do not believe that the Democrats or the government advance their interests. They think the government advances the interests of non whites at their expense, and that the Democrat Party approves of this.
     
    1. shootersa
      Dog simply must understand his endless rants about minorities are tiresome, incorrect, and mean little more than the spittle from an angry cow.
       
      shootersa, Nov 26, 2017
    2. Sanity_is_Relative
      GOD man you are a fucking racist trying to put EVERYTHING off on us blacks and Mexicans. Dude or what ever you are sweetheart, we are not the root of the worlds ills, it's people like you, and the extremists et al.
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Dec 1, 2017
    #84
  5. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    Dog simply must understand his endless rants about minorities are tiresome, incorrect, and mean little more than the spittle from an angry cow.

    - shootersa

    ---------

    As usual you have not refuted anything I wrote. Instead you attack me. This is known as the ad hominem fallacy.

    ---------

    Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person." An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.

    ---------

    In your case you're not even posting a fact about me.

    It is by no means true that I criticize all minorities in the United States. On many occasions I have expressed my admiration for Jews and Orientals. In addition, I admire East Indians in the United States. Jews, Orientals, and East Indians in the United States have average IQ's, average educational attainments, and average incomes that exceed those of white Gentiles. They have achieved these despite persecution and discrimination. I am myself a white Gentile.

    It is easy for my detractors on the left and the right to throw jejune insults at me in response to my frequently controversial arguments. It is impossible to demonstrate that what I believe is not true.

    I am a Democrat and a liberal on most issues. The Democrats once dominated the United States. They lost that dominance because Negroes as a group did not live up to the hopes white liberals had for them. The segregationists I argued with as a child and a teenager have turned out to be correct.

    All you and others can do is insult me. That confirms the validity of my racial opinions.
     
    1. shootersa
      Your arguments have been refuted so many times it becomes tiresome to continue.
      You insist that blacks are somehow genetically inferior, and that the entire civil rights movement and the legislation that followed has raised a bunch of inferior beings beyond their proper station in life, and as a result they are spoiled, unappreciative, and dangerous.

      The foundation of your belief, that blacks are somehow genetically inferior, has been refuted and you have been challenged to point to the gene(s) that are responsible. You have consistently failed to do so. All you do is endlessly, boringly, repeat the same disproved argument using facts that are cherry picked, irrelevant, or taken out of context.


      1) Which gene(s) are responsible for the inferior performance of blacks?
      2) How is it that over 3,000 blacks, despite the overt and covert sabotage by their white commanders, managed to outperform allied and axis air groups in WWII?
       
      shootersa, Nov 27, 2017
      Trev1 likes this.
    #85
  6. JimmyCrackPorn

    JimmyCrackPorn Porn Star

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2017
    Messages:
    5,240
    Senator Hatch has a message for you.

     
    • Like Like x 1
    #86
  7. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    But what about you? Your response to my courteous and fact based arguments consists of nothing but insults.
     
    #87
  8. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    Your arguments have been refuted so many times it becomes tiresome to continue.
    You insist that blacks are somehow genetically inferior, and that the entire civil rights movement and the legislation that followed has raised a bunch of inferior beings beyond their proper station in life, and as a result they are spoiled, unappreciative, and dangerous.

    The foundation of your belief, that blacks are somehow genetically inferior, has been refuted and you have been challenged to point to the gene(s) that are responsible. You have consistently failed to do so. All you do is endlessly, boringly, repeat the same disproved argument using facts that are cherry picked, irrelevant, or taken out of context.


    1) Which gene(s) are responsible for the inferior performance of blacks?
    2) How is it that over 3,000 blacks, despite the overt and covert sabotage by their white commanders, managed to outperform allied and axis air groups in WWII?

    - shootersa

    --------

    My opinions about racial matters have never been refuted. They have only been shouted at.

    I have never said, "blacks are somehow genetically inferior." That would mean that I believe that the most intelligent black person is less intelligent than the least intelligent white person. That is clearly not the case. Nevertheless, one can see with equal clarity that average racial differences exist, persist, and that they are significant.

    Distorting what I do believe about racial differences is an example of the straw man fallacy. In the straw man fallacy one distorts an argument in order to make it easier to refute.

    ---------

    The New York Times, May 22, 2017

    In a significant advance in the study of mental ability, a team of European and American scientists announced on Monday that they had identified 52 genes linked to intelligence in nearly 80,000 people...

    Brain size explains a small part of the variation, for example, although there are plenty of people with small brains who score higher than others with bigger brains.

    Other studies hint that intelligence has something to do with how efficiently a brain can send signals from one region to another.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/science/52-genes-human-intelligence.html?_r=0

    ---------

    This is just the beginning. For a long time there have been effective taboos and sanctions against scientific research into the genetic reasons for intelligence differences between individuals, and average differences between races.

    I am glad that these taboos and sanctions are weakening, because the truth has important political implications. I hope that Charles Murray lives long enough to be fully vindicated.

    You continue to mention the Tuskegee Airmen. They performed well, but it cannot be said that they performed better than similar white units. Also, the Tuskegee Airmen were chosen from the most capable black recruits during World War II. Comparing them with similar white units is like comparing the all state high school basketball team of one state with a high school basketball from another state.
     
    #88
  9. NoOneFamous

    NoOneFamous Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,095
    looks like there are three sane Republicans in the Senate.
     
    #89
  10. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    bump
     
    #90
  11. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    I wish I agreed with you. I think those "three sane Republicans" went over to the dark side.
     
    #91
  12. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    86,390
    *sighs
    Again, what genes are unique to blacks that explains their inferiority according to you?

    Now, lets see.
    The Tuskagee airmen were President Roosevelt's experiment to prove or disprove the military belief that Blacks were incapable of operating complex machinery under stressful situations. Roosevelt in effect said; round up a bunch of them, give them complicated machinery, and put them under stress. Lets see how they do.
    The Military was not excited about the idea, but then, they had to, cause, you know, the President ordered it. The Generals in the pentagon did everything they could do to discourage the idea. You know, it's war, we need every airplane, we don't dare take away vital resources for this experiment of yours. The President said; Nope, we're gonna do this.

    And in fact, according to any OBJECTIVE review of their accomplishments, the Tuskagee air group out performed not only their US counterparts, but their German, Italian, and Japanese counterparts.
    Quite simply, they kicked ass. While similar all white air groups, charged with protecting bomber groups, routinely lost over 10% of the bombers to enemy attacks, the Tuskagee Air Group, in four years of escorting bombing groups lost exactly 4 bombers. The next closest group lost hundreds of bombers.
    What that boils down to is, every time a bomber went down, we lost 10 airmen and a very expensive piece of equipment. The Tuskagee Air Group lost 40 of those men under their protection. The next closest group lost thousands of men under their protection.

    "Performed adequately" indeed.

    And the Tuskagee air group did this in spite of both overt and covert sabotage by their white commanders. Things like misrouting vital supplies. Making sure they didn't have the same support. Sending them on longer, more dangerous missions. Falsifying reports. Ordering investigations based on frivolous reports they knew had been falsified.
    They even had a military board of inquiry in Washington, and after a week of closed door testimony, determined that the group was in fact out performing similar white groups.

    And your explanation is that the military, when staffing the Tuskagee air group, found the best blacks they could find. The military that was determined to make the experiment fail. The military that did just about everything they could do to sabotage the experiment.

    Kind of like what we're seeing with President Trump. A bunch of closed minded bigots, pissed off because their man (woman) lost are determined to sabotage a presidency and willing to use any means, because their cause is just, their mission pure. They know they are right, and damn anyone who dares disagree with them.
    Comparisons of basketball teams? Nope.
    More like Karma is a bitch.
     
    #92
  13. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    Again you distort my opinions.

    Lower average intelligence and higher rates of crime are characteristic of Negroes everywhere they live, even in countries where they have faced minimal discrimination, like Canada. This strongly indicates genetic causation, like the fact that blacks tend to have higher blood pressure, and to have more problems with high salt diets.

    The problems blacks have with salt are easy to explain genetically. They evolved in a hot climate, so their bodies needed to be able to conserve salt.

    And why should we assume that discrimination leads to low intelligence? Jews are 0.2% of the world's population. They were discriminated against for nearly two housand years, following the crushing of the Bar Kokhba Revolt in 132 - 136 AD. This discrimination culminated in the Holocaust. Nevertheless, Jews dominate every field requiring high intelligence. They have won about 20% of Nobel Prizes.

    Indeed, persecution caused the Ashkenazi Jews in Christian Europe to evolve more intelligence. They were not allowed to own land or to practice most trades. They were allowed to be money lenders. Christians were not. Success in finance requires intelligence. Roman numbers, which dominated arithmetic until the high middle ages, are much more difficult to work with than Arabic numbers.

    Jews also managed aristocratic estates and worked as tax farmers. Jews who could not learn the necessary skills did not have children, or they left the faith.

    Because some blacks are intelligent and some whites are not, it is unnecessary to postulate genes that are unique to either race. Nevertheless, genes that influence intelligence and crime vary between the races.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2017
    #93
  14. Sanity_is_Relative

    Sanity_is_Relative Porn Star

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    19,071
    Ok Distant Lover I asked long ago that you explain Black Wall Street, no I am asking how it is that you explain how a group of ignorant, uneducated, base level criminal tree swinging niggers created their own independent society in the 1900's not needing any help form whites and had a very low level of even petty crimes???? Oh, and better yet how did us coons do that feat in Tulsa Oklahoma?
    I can and will answer that last one, simple economics; we could not shop or live in ANY community that was 75% of either race. See us inferior niggers could only shop with our own people.
    Here is a date for you to look up, May 31-June 1, 1921, Tulsa Oklahoma. 9000 of the 10,000 BLACK residents of the attacked neighborhood arrested for a "race riot"; a very prominent BLACK surgeon was murdered after surrendering and not 1 person was ever charged, look up this name A.C. Jackson and his accolades from the Mayo Clinic.
    In today's values Greenwoods damages are valued at about $30 million and mostly based on a false newspaper headline.
    They printed the head line of basically "nab negro for assault on white woman" , an act she(the WHITE WOMAN) denied for years after, and admitted that she was in love with the supposed attacker.
     
    1. CS natureboy
      Don't be so hard on DL, after all, he is on your side....:hilarious: He represents the Democrat party very well. The Democrats keep black politicians segregated inside the party and at arms length for the most part until it's time for a picture or to conjure up some votes...
       
      CS natureboy, Dec 2, 2017
    2. Sanity_is_Relative
      "HE" is not in any form a representative of me or my wife or even our life. "HE" is a bigot, a homophobic/ xenophobe racist.
      "HE" is about as educated as my pet hamster was and is as stuck in how he is as David Duke.
      What is actually comedic its that I barely even graduated from a ghetto high school and even I see most of the people here are are classless, racist, classit, uneducated AMERICANS,
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Dec 2, 2017
    #94
  15. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    Some blacks are capable of performing well. Most are capable of behaving well.
     
    1. CS natureboy
      Now if that's not a compliment....:hilarious:
       
      CS natureboy, Dec 2, 2017
    #95
  16. Sanity_is_Relative

    Sanity_is_Relative Porn Star

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    19,071
    So then what do you say about the very FACT that the author of your favorite theory admitted that the Iq tests and the testing methodology and his book are all wrong?
     
    #96
  17. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,057
    Who was that? Where did he say it? Quote him.
     
    1. Sanity_is_Relative
      Well that would be Charles Murray in an interview with a Sam Harris.
      I don't know the exact date of the interview
      Published on Apr 24, 2017
      This is an excerpt from episode 73 of Waking Up with Sam Harris, published on the 22nd of April 2017, titled Forbidden Knowledge, in which Sam Harris talks to Charles Murray about racial, cultural, and gender specific IQ differences..

      It is quite a long interview, about 40 minutes on the YouTube posting.
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Dec 2, 2017
    2. Sanity_is_Relative
      Well, since "HE" will not even respond, and will pick the interview apart for "HIS" own benefit it is my responsibility to do this.
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Dec 2, 2017
    #97
  18. deleted user 777 698

    deleted user 777 698 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    8,747
    Why get down into the cesspool with racist democrats trying to discriminate against one minority in particular? After all this certainly isn't new, they have been holding our African American citizens back since they were brought here as slaves.

    The republicans under President Trump will finally end this deceitful charade. The first step has been accomplished with the tax reform.

    The next step will be to remove the impediments former democrat administrations have managed to put into place through deceitful laws they managed to pass.

    These reforms will insure more prosperity for all and specifically African Americans. They will also insure President Trump will have 7 more years to fully implement much needed policy changes here in the U.S.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #98
  19. conroe4

    conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,759
    And what does all this jibberish have to do with the GOP tax bill?
     
    #99
  20. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    I is another total derailment by DL that thinks he can post anything anyplace.....

    *not_secure_link*meganandtimmy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/train-derail.jpg
     
    1. conroe4
      I've heard others got suspensions for derailing threads...oh, that's right...it's the weekend. Everyone gets a pass.
       
      conroe4, Dec 2, 2017